RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-03544
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His Career Airman Base of Preference (BOP) assignment action code
be removed from his current assignment.
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He did not request a BOP for his current assignment at Langley
AFB, VA and requests the code be removed so he does not lose the
opportunity to apply for a BOP in the future.
He requested a BOP at his last duty station; however, he was
advised that his preferences could not be supported thus canceled
his application.
On 19 Aug 13, he removed his desired BOP locations from the
Virtual Military Personnel Flight (vMPF). He then applied and was
selected for a non-BOP assignment to Langley AFB.
Upon arriving at Langley AFB, he learned the Military Personnel
Data System (MILPDS) was coded to reflect he was on a BOP
assignment.
The applicants complete submission, with attachment, is at
Exhibit A.
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant is currently serving on active duty in the Regular
Air Force in the grade of Staff Sergeant (SSgt, E-5).
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPAA5 recommends the applicants assignment action reason be
changed from A1 to XX and his assignment availability code of
28 which denotes Base of Preference with an expiration date of
31 Jan 16 be deleted. DPAA5 reviewed the applicants assignment
action in MILPDS and there was no evidence he submitted a BOP
application for Langley AFB.
A complete copy of the DPAA5 evaluation is at Exhibit B.
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant
on 26 Jan 15 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit C).
As of this date, no response has been received by this office.
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of an error or injustice. We took notice of the
applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case
and agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force
office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the
basis for our conclusion the applicant has been the victim of an
error or injustice. Therefore, we recommend the applicant's
records be corrected as indicated below.
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to the APPLICANT be corrected to show that his assignment
action reason be changed in the Military Personnel Data System
(MILPDS) from A1 to XX and his Assignment Availability Code
(AAC 28) with an expiration date of 31 Jan 16 be deleted.
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number
BC-2014-03544 in Executive Session on 14 Apr 15 under the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:
, Panel Chair
, Member
, Member
All members voted to correct the records as recommended. The
following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket Number
BC-2014-03544 was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 26 Aug 14, w/atch.
Exhibit B. Memorandum, AFPC/DPAA5, dated 23 Dec 14.
Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 26 Jan 15.
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00323
A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSOO evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPSID recommends denial of the applicants request to remove his N-O PRF for the PO513A CSB and replace it with an updated version, indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. Once a file is accepted for record, only strong evidence to the contrary warrants correction or removal from the record. While the Board notes the applicants letter of support from the ACC/CC, we believe it would be inappropriate for...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04393
On that same date, she executed the AF Form 3008, Supplement to Enlistment Agreement USAF, agreeing to enlist as an Airman First Class for a term of six years. Although she was decertified, she is still obligated to serve her six year term of enlistment. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01913
He voluntarily separated from the Air Force and was promised a DOS of 8 Aug 09, based on transferring to The United States Public Health Services (USPHS) as of 9 Aug 09. His separation request reflects a requested DOS of 2 Aug 09, and under MILPDS DATA his DOS is reflected as 8 Aug 3888. On 2 Aug 09, the applicant separated from the Air Force. We cannot comment on the applicants eligibility for HAP as his separation was due to declining an assignment and not because he transferred...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00844
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letters prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) which is included at Exhibit B. The applicant did not want to reenlist at that time because a 2 year reenlistment would not entitle him to a zone A SRB; to be eligible for the SRB the member has to reenlist or extend for a minimum of 36 months. The second retainability suspense delay would have allowed the applicant to reenlist for four...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05524
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05524 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His duty history be amended to reflect Deputy Commander, 92nd Mission Support Group (MSG) rather than Deputy Commander, 92nd Logistics Readiness Squadron (LRS). APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: While he was not directly assigned to the MSG, and his duty history reflects he served as the Deputy Commander for the LRS,...
AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00192
You did, at or near Mildenhall AFB, UK and at or near Langley AFB, VA, between on or about 26 Feb 98 and on or about 8 Feb 99, fail to obey a lawful general regulation, to wit: paragraph 4, AFI 65-104, Government Travel Charge Card Program, dated 1 May 96, by not paying in full the amount billed upon receipt of your monthly Government American Express Card Statement =---Y?~~,--~~y~;g--kfi~wledge of a lawful order issued by Col :---------------------------:I) 25 Nov 98 to immediately remove...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00225
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBERS: BC-2004-00225 IDEX CODE 131.01 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Assignment History section of his Officer Selection Brief (OSB) reflect a command level of “NAF” versus “DD/J” for the 23 Dec 97 entry, and the 30 Nov 99 entry be removed in its entirety. A complete copy of the evaluation is at...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-02061
An action officer was assigned to the request on 16 November 2005. DPSO’s complete evaluation is at Exhibit B. ______________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that 19 days of leave were added to his leave account commencing 2 October 2006.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03119
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-03119 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Term of Enlistment (TOE) for his 26 September 2008 reenlistment be considered as five years and nine weeks rather than five years and nine months. Per Air Force guidance, years and months is the only authorized terms of enlistment/reenlistment...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03544
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-03544 INDEX CODE: 100.03, 100.06 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His narrative reason for separation and reenlistment eligibility (RE) code be changed to allow him to rejoin the Armed Forces. A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit...